Don’t Neglect to Like and подпишись!

Sep 6, 2024
Maybe probably the most correct cliché is that if a deal seems too good to be true, then it in all probability is.To wit: If a “non-public investor” of unknown origin approaches you thru an middleman, providing you $400,000 a month to make “4 weekly movies” for a politically partisan web site and YouTube web page, you could need to try to comply with the cash to make sure you’re not being paid by a overseas authorities as a propagandist. And when you do try a little bit of due diligence and ask after the id of your non-public investor, you may need to double-check that she or he is an actual individual. For instance, in case your middleman sends you a swiftly Photoshopped résumé that includes a inventory photograph of a well-coiffed man trying wistfully out the window of a non-public jet, it's potential that the “completed finance skilled” who's “deeply engaged in enterprise and philanthropy, leveraging expertise and assets to drive optimistic affect” might, in truth, be a pretend man with a pretend title.Now, I'm not a lawyer, and this isn't a authorized perspective. However I do have a few years {of professional} work expertise in media and entry to subscription-tier flowchart software program to supply some recommendation:It's possible you'll be pondering that such knowledge visualization is pointless—that after all a YouTuber wouldn’t blindly settle for $4.8 million a 12 months and a $100,000 signing bonus to make 208 video models of political propaganda for a little-known benefactor. I, too, was of this opinion till I learn Wednesday’s unsealed indictment of Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva, two workers of RT, a Russian state-controlled media outlet, who, in response to the Division of Justice, allegedly “deployed practically $10 million to publish RT-curated content material … by means of...

0 Comments