Yesterday, Elon Musk informed me that he’ll settle for the outcomes of the 2024 presidential election. “After all” he would, he stated after I requested him as a lot by e-mail. Ever the gentleman, he added, in obvious haste, “Don’t be jackass.”
I can think about why he wished to get that dig in. In years previous, asking somebody whether or not they imagine within the primary actuality of America’s electoral course of could be a bit of bit like asking them to acknowledge that they must pay for groceries. However anybody who fears for the steadiness of American democracy may fear about how Musk—the richest man on the earth, a newly vocal supporter of Donald Trump, and the proprietor of X, one of the vital influential social platforms for political discourse—would reply this easy query. He has an amazing following and management over a web site on which (and from which) misinformation and radical messaging can rapidly unfold. Currently, he has been spreading numerous misinformation and radical messaging himself.
Musk has turn out to be preoccupied with posting conspiracy theories on X, claiming this week, for instance, that “the legacy media engages within the mass synchronization of emotion for political functions” on behalf of the Democratic Nationwide Committee, and that “the Biden-Harris Administration is importing huge numbers of voters.” (He has repeated that second declare, which facilities on the concept that foreigners are being flown into the USA illegally to commit voter fraud, a fewoccasions.) He not too long ago shared a bogus marketing campaign video for Kamala Harris by which a pretend model of the candidate’s voice, maybe AI-generated, says, “I’m the last word variety rent,” amongst different insulting issues. Musk’s take: “That is wonderful 😂”
Musk is amongst a rarefied cohort of highly effective individuals who, as my colleague Adrienne LaFrance not too long ago wrote, “stoke contempt for his or her political adversaries, actual and perceived, and encourage legions of followers to mistrust the unbiased sources of knowledge that attempt to maintain them accountable.” Or as my colleague Charlie Warzel put it in 2022: Elon Musk is a far-right activist.
Studying an excessive amount of into Musk’s provocations may be folly. In lots of circumstances, Musk would in all probability argue that he’s joking round—a protection he’s mounted earlier than. He’s a prolific troll who regularly posts for the lulz. As his biographer Walter Isaacson informed me final yr, “He’s addicted in a harmful method to the darkish, impulsive tweets which might be dangerous to his legacy but in addition dangerous to society.” And it appears unlikely that he’s influencing very many individuals’s politics; he performs to a crowd of yes-men who discover their opinions mirrored in his posts fairly than formed by them.
From the September 2024 problem: American fury
Shitposting or not, nevertheless, Musk’s outright embrace of extremism must be taken critically. Within the context of this presidential election, the stakes are too excessive to easily brush it away. Social media may be like a poisonous fuel that slowly fills a room: seemingly innocent till it turns into catastrophic. A easy tweet from Trump inspired folks to collect on the Capitol on January 6, based on the Home committee’s investigation. (On the day of the riot, Trump was briefly barred from Twitter and Fb for utilizing the platforms to incite violence and unfold election misinformation.) And conspiracy theories fomented on the web can result in violence: Shortly after Election Day 2020, two males with handguns and a rifle had been arrested close to a vote-counting location in Philadelphia; they had been later convicted on gun costs. Their automotive had a sticker on its again window, captured in a {photograph} by the Related Press: It learn #WWG1WGA above an enormous purple Q, overt references to the QAnon conspiracy idea, which originated on 4chan. The hashtag—an acronym for “The place we go one, we go all”—is in use on X to this present day. After President Joe Biden bowed out of the race, Musk elevated a put up from a distinguished QAnon character stating that “Democrats destroy democracy in pursuit of energy.”
The tech billionaire’s assist of Trump and canine whistles about interference—all these imagined imported voters—invitations the chance that he may very well be an influential voice in resisting a Harris victory. His posts make it simple to assume he may take part encouraging open revolt, even violence, if MAGA supporters are as soon as once more egged on by Trump—he may additionally actively suppress counter-perspectives by way of his management of the X platform, if he so needs. “The need of the folks should be acknowledged,” Musk insisted after I requested him how he would reply if folks referred to as for violence after the election or unfold denial concerning the outcomes. “If there are questions of election integrity, they need to be correctly investigated and neither be dismissed out of hand nor unreasonably questioned. If, after assessment of the election outcomes, it seems that Kamala wins, that win ought to be acknowledged and never disputed.”
I don’t know take this. Perhaps the response is as simple because it seems: If Harris wins, then Harris wins. However Musk’s caveat—“if, after assessment”—echoes Trump’s personal logic: The previous president has maintained that the 2020 election was stolen and that he’ll settle for the result this yr provided that the proceedings are “truthful and authorized and good.” If nothing else, Musk has actually in-built some wiggle room. We won’t be able to dismiss any suspicion or push apart the people who find themselves simply asking questions. This slipperiness is a trademark of on-line trolling, the place the whole lot’s a joke except it’s severe, and it’s your fault for getting the unsuitable impression.
Learn: Demon mode activated
Musk is capricious and stated as a lot in his second e-mail to me. He adopted his notion about election integrity with a defensive posture: “I supported each Clintons, Obama and Biden,” he stated. “That is the primary time I’m supporting a Republican candidate and, sooner or later, I could return to supporting Democrat candidates.” After which: “Why are you not questioning Google’s apparent political bias? I simply did a Google seek for ‘Trump rally’ and the highest result’s Kamala.”
Musk, together with different right-wing personalities, has been posting nonstop a couple of perceived left-leaning bias from Google, based mostly partially on the search engine’s failure to routinely fill in sure search queries about Donald Trump. (Basically, the notion that Google would fiddle with its algorithms to account for politics isn’t totally unreasonable; earlier this yr, for instance, the corporate introduced that its Gemini chatbot is not going to reply sure queries associated to the election.) In his second e-mail, Musk connected a screenshot displaying that, in response to the question Trump rally, Google’s “High tales” part was surfacing articles a couple of Kamala Harris rally. I did ask Google about this: Meghann Farnsworth, a spokesperson for the corporate, pointed me to a sequence of X posts from Google’s comms crew claiming that bugs and algorithmic quirks precipitated these points. You may nonetheless discover details about Trump on the search engine.
Musk stopped responding to my emails after this. He didn’t inform me whether or not he believed that the earlier election was truthful and legit, nor did he outline what a “assessment of the election outcomes” would imply. We all know he’s supporting Trump, a convicted felon who tried to remain in energy when he misplaced. We all know that Musk says he’ll settle for a Harris election, below the best circumstances. However within the meantime, he appears to be doing no matter he can to undermine that final result. This morning, he was again to posting about voter fraud, leaving us with a moment-defining phrase: “Extraordinarily disturbing!”
0 Comments